Jones v. Centurion et al
| Tommy Earl Jones |
| Centurion, Sonia Teles, Curry Butler and Steven H. Wheeler |
| 3:2016cv00322 |
| June 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Knoxville Office |
| Knox |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Harry S Mattice |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 1 ; DENIES AS PREMATURE the motions filed by Defendants Teles, Butler, Wheeler, and Centurion [Docs. 10, 14, 16]; GRANTS Plaintiffs m otion to voluntarily dismiss Butler and Wheeler from thisaction 18 ; DENIES Plaintiffs construed motion to amend his Complaint 6 ; DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiffs motion to dismiss Andrews and Sator from thisaction 19 ; DENIES Plaintiffs construed motio n to supplement his Complaint 7 ; DISMISSES this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may begranted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and1915(A); and CERTIFIES that any appeal from this act ion would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous.Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 8/21/17. (c/m to Tommy Earl Jones, Warden of Northeast Correctional Complex, the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Correction, and the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee)(ABF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
