Thompson v. USA (TWP1)

Thompson v. USA (TWP1)

Petitioner:	Abigail B. Thompson
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	3:2017cv00307
Filed:	July 18, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Knoxville Office
County:	Blount
Presiding Judge:	Thomas W Phillips
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 30, 2020	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Petitioner's § 2255 motion to vacate [Doc. 1] will be DENIED and DISMISSED. The Court will DENY issuance of a certificate of appealability. A separate judgment will enter. Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on March 30, 2020. (copy mailed to Abigail Thompson c/o FCI Tallahassee) (AYB)
March 27, 2019	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION: the Court finds that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve whether and to what extent Mr. Santore consulted with Petitioner regarding an appeal. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and ( C), the Court hereby REFERS Petitioner's § 2255 motion to vacate to Debra C. Poplin, United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this single claim; to appoint counsel to represent Petitioner at the hearing, and fo r a Report and Recommendation. The remaining claims in Petitioner's motion [Case no. 3:17-cv-307, Doc. 1] will be DENIED. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on March 27, 2019. (copy mailed to Abigail Thompson #31316-074 at FCI Tallahassee) (AYB)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 30, 2020

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Petitioner's § 2255 motion to vacate [Doc. 1] will be DENIED and DISMISSED. The Court will DENY issuance of a certificate of appealability. A separate judgment will enter. Signed by District Judge R Leon Jordan on March 30, 2020. (copy mailed to Abigail Thompson c/o FCI Tallahassee) (AYB)

March 27, 2019

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION: the Court finds that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve whether and to what extent Mr. Santore consulted with Petitioner regarding an appeal. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and ( C), the Court hereby REFERS Petitioner's § 2255 motion to vacate to Debra C. Poplin, United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this single claim; to appoint counsel to represent Petitioner at the hearing, and fo r a Report and Recommendation. The remaining claims in Petitioner's motion [Case no. 3:17-cv-307, Doc. 1] will be DENIED. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on March 27, 2019. (copy mailed to Abigail Thompson #31316-074 at FCI Tallahassee) (AYB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. USA (TWP1)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Abigail B. Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?