Proffitt et al v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company (TV2)
Sugarland Weddings, Inc., Christ in the Smokies Museum & Gardens, Christ in the Smokies, LLC, Billy Proffitt and Sugarland Weddings |
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company |
3:2019cv00002 |
January 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Debra C Poplin |
Thomas A Varlan |
Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4053 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on January 3, 2019. (RLK) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on January 3, 2019. (RLK) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on January 3, 2019. (RLK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward Jason Ferrell on behalf of Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company (Ferrell, Edward) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Chastain, Parks) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sevier County Circuit Court, case number 18-CV-785. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3851094), filed by Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint)(Chastain, Parks) |
Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.