Teague v. Blount County Jail
Kenneth Teague |
Blount County Jail |
3:2019cv00211 |
June 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
H Bruce Guyton |
Thomas A Varlan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoners pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983, is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court CERTIFIES, for the reasons contained in the memorandum and order, that any appeal taken from this decision would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/8/19. (c/m to Kenneth Teague, BLOUNT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 920 E LAMAR ALEXANDER PARKWAY, MARYVILLE, TN 37804)(ABF) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/8/19.(c/m to Kenneth Teague, BLOUNT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 920 E LAMAR ALEXANDER PARKWAY, MARYVILLE, TN 37804)(ABF) |
Filing 6 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Kenneth Teague, MOTION #3 for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kenneth Teague is GRANTED. Because Plaintiff is an inmate in the Blount County Jail, he is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. To ensure compliance with this fee-collection procedure, the Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to the custodian of inmate accounts at the institution where Plaintiff is now confined. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this order to the Courts financial deputy.Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 6/14/19. (c/m to Custodian of Inmate Accounts and Kenneth Teague at BLOUNT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 920 E LAMAR ALEXANDER PARKWAY, MARYVILLE, TN 37804)(ABF) |
Filing 5 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (c/m to Kenneth Teague, BLOUNT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 920 E LAMAR ALEXANDER PARKWAY, MARYVILLE, TN 37804) (ABF) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Blount County Jail, filed by Kenneth Teague.(ABF) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Teague. (ABF) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Deficiency (IFP) - The Court is in receipt of your complaint/petition. However, in order for this matter to proceed, you must either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Copy mailed to Kenneth Teague at Blount County Jail with IFP and complaint forms.) (KMK) |
Filing 1 Letter from Kenneth Teague re: Blount County Jail and request for attorney (KMK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Teague v. Blount County Jail | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kenneth Teague | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Blount County Jail | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.