Ohmer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
MARK OHMER |
ANDREW SAUL and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
SSA Office of General Counsel |
3:2019cv00355 |
September 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Susan K Lee |
Thomas A Varlan |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to SSA Office of General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (BDG) |
Filing 5 NOTICE re IFP Service. (BDG) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 9/16/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark Ohmer. (Attachments: #1 Other proposed order)(Martin, Charles) |
Filing 2 Administrative Notice to Counsel #1 Complaint - SSA :Attachment should be filed separately. Please refile your motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis separately i.e. Civil Events, Motions and Related Filings, Motions, In Forma Pauperis (Proceed). requirements due by 9/16/2019. (BDG) |
District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (BDG) |
Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by MARK OHMER. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Other civil cover sheet, #3 Summons combined summons, #4 Other pauper proposed order)(Martin, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.