Muszik et al v. Acuity Mutual Insurance Company
| Carol Muszik and Jerry Muszik |
| Acuity Mutual Insurance Company |
| 3:2020cv00377 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: On September 1, 2020, the Court ordered the parties to confer under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within thirty (30) days of that order and to submit a report of that meeting within fourteen (14) days of the conference [Doc. 9]. Those deadlines have passed, and the parties have failed to file a Rule 26(f) report. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that a telephonic scheduling conference is set for Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. EST. The parties shall call the Court's conference line at 866-390-1828 and enter access code 4845352 at the appointed time. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file their Rule 26(f) report on or before Monday, November 16,2020. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 10/22/2020. (CAT)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company (Miller, Cory) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Attorney Withdrawal Attorney Elijah C. Lovingfoss terminated. (Lovingfoss, Elijah) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 9/1/20. (Attachments: #1 Other Notice Consent/Non-Consent) (JBR)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Generally, scheduling orders will be entered by the Court after a telephonic scheduling conferences unless otherwise requested by the parties. It is therefore ORDERED: As soon as practicable, but in no event later than 30 days from the first appearance of a defendant, or if that has already occurred, within 30 days of this order, the parties must confer, in a conference arranged by plaintiffs' counsel, for the purpose of considering the nature and basis of their claims and defenses. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 09/01/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent/Non-Consent) (AMP)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- The Policy)(Miller, Cory) |
|
Filing 7
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 08/25/2020. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 6
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 08/25/2020. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 08/25/2020. (CAT)
|
| Filing 4 Administrative Notice to Counsel #3 Notice (Other) : INFORMATIONAL ONLY. For future reference, please file Civil Cover Sheets in a non-fillable format. (CAT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Cory) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Miller, Cory) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sevier County Chancery Court, case number 20-7-133. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4459001), filed by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- State Court Complaint)(Miller, Cory) |
| District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
