Brown v. HDR Logistics, LLC
| Roland Brown |
| HDR Logistics, LLC, Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv00307 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Curtis L Collier |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Roland Brown. (Cruise, Patrick) |
Filing 17
ORDER.Show Cause Order #10 is DISMISSED. The Court INSTRUCTS the Clerk of Court to hold application for default IN ABEYANCE until the Court rules on the Motion to Remand. #11 Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on October 14, 2021. (SAC)
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Nautilus Insurance Company. (Watson, Jordan) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by Great Divide Insurance Company.(Mullins, Derek) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION for Clerk's Default as to HDR Logistics, LLC by Roland Brown. Party is instructed to email the proposed default to the clerk at the appropriate email address in accordance with #http://www.tned.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/civil_forms. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Cruise, Patrick) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Roland Brown. (Cruise, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Roland Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return on Service of Summons-HDR Logistics, LLC)(Cruise, Patrick) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Roland Brown. (Cruise, Patrick) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that within fourteen(14) days of the date of entry of this Order:(1) HDR and Great Divide shall each respond to the amended complaint; OR(2) Plaintiff shall move for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) against any Defendantwho has not responded to the amended complaint; OR(3) Plaintiff shall show cause why his claims against HDR and Great Divide should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b). Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 9/27/2021. (BDG)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Nautilus Insurance Company.(Mullins, Derek) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Nautilus Insurance Company. (Watson, Jordan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Derek Wayne Mullins on behalf of Nautilus Insurance Company (Mullins, Derek) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by Nautilus Insurance Company. (Watson, Jordan) |
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/30/2021. (JCK)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/30/2021. (JCK)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions Signed by District Judge Curtis L Collier on 8/30/2021. (JCK)
|
| Filing 2 Administrative Notice to Counsel re #1 Notice of Removal. Civil cover sheet not included. Requirements due by 9/7/2021. (JCK) |
| District Judge Curtis L Collier and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (JCK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, case number 26696-I. (Receipt Number ATNEDC-4828267), filed by Nautilus Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Watson, Jordan) Modified on 8/30/2021 to add receipt information (JCK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
