Noles v. Internal Revenue Service et al
| James D. Noles, II |
| Internal Revenue Service and United States of America |
| 3:2022cv00297 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Travis R McDonough |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 9/1/22. (c/m to James D. Noles, II, 8210 Meadow Falls Lane, Knoxville, TN 37931-4062) (ABF)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 9/1/22. (c/m to James D. Noles, II, 8210 Meadow Falls Lane, Knoxville, TN 37931-4062) (ABF)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 9/1/22. (c/m to James D. Noles, II, 8210 Meadow Falls Lane, Knoxville, TN 37931-4062) (ABF)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Internal Revenue Service, United States of America and returned to pro se plaintiff for service. (Attachments: #1 Summons Deputy Assistant Attorney General David Hubbert)(ABF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Internal Revenue Service, United States of America (Filing fee received 300000317 $ 402.), filed by James D. Noles, II. (Attachments: #1 Other Exhibits, #2 Other civil cover sheet, #3 Other Envelope)(ABF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
