Swarner et al v. Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC (JRG2)
Plaintiff: Bryan Swarner and Joy Swarner
Defendant: Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv00298
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Referring Judge: Debra C Poplin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case without prejudice by Bryan Swarner, Joy Swarner (Philipps, David) Modified on 9/26/2022 to note case number on Notice is incorrect but counsel correctly noted the parties and filed in the correct case (AYB).
September 19, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bryan Swarner, Joy Swarner. Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC served on 9/7/2022. (Philipps, David)
September 8, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Cynthia Turner Lawson on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Lawson, Cynthia)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 09/02/2022. (AMP)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 09/02/2022. (AMP)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 09/02/2022. (AMP)
September 2, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC. (AMP)
September 2, 2022 District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (AMP)
September 1, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary E Philipps on behalf of Bryan Swarner, Joy Swarner (Philipps, Mary)
September 1, 2022 Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Bryan Swarner, Joy Swarner. (Philipps, David)
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt #ATNEDC-5158916 against Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, filed by Bryan Swarner, Joy Swarner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Group E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons)(Philipps, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swarner et al v. Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC (JRG2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan Swarner
Represented By: Mary E Philipps
Represented By: David J Philipps
Represented By: Cynthia Turner Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joy Swarner
Represented By: Mary E Philipps
Represented By: David J Philipps
Represented By: Cynthia Turner Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?