Whitaker v. Minter
Petitioner: Brooke Lee Whitaker
Respondent: Trinity Minter
Case Number: 4:2015cv00010
Filed: March 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Winchester Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William B Carter
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Petitioner's § 2254 petition 1 will be DENIED and this action will be DISMISSED. The Court will DENY issuance of a COA. A SEPARATE JUDGMENT ORDER WILL ISSUE.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 3/29/18. (aws, ) Mailed to Brooke Whitaker.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitaker v. Minter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brooke Lee Whitaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Trinity Minter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?