Coggin v. Social Security Administration
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 13, 2012
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded $4,225.50 in attorney fees to be charged against the Defendant in this action and paid to Plaintiff, Bobby Darrell Coggin, Jr., minus any debt to the government that is subject t o offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716). Any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and sent to Plaintiff's counsel at his office address. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 11/13/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|September 25, 2012
ORDER: Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Knowles, Document 19 , and the objection of Plaintiff thereto, Document 20 . No response to the objection has been filed. This case is reversed and remanded to the Adminis trative Law Judge to take further proof if necessary on the issue of whether there is a causal connection between Defendant's depression and alcoholism and/or substance abuse and whether his depression would continue if he stopped using alcohol and drugs. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 9/25/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|July 31, 2012
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons discussed above, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record 12 be DENIED, and that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 7/31/12. (tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?