Payne v. United States of America
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 11, 2013
ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the motion filed by Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence 1 is hereby DENIED. This action, therefore, is hereby DISMISS ED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will not issue as to the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel set forth in the movant's motion. Rule 11(a), Rules Gov'g § 2255 Motions. Entry of this order shall constitute the judgment in this action. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/11/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|October 4, 2012
ORDER: As it is not readily apparent on the face of the motion that the movant is not entitled to relief, Rule 4(b), Rules Section 2255 Proceedings, the United States Attorney for this judicial district shall file an answer, plead, or otherwise respo nd to the motion 1 in accordance with Rule 5, Rules Section 2255 Proceedings, within 30 days of the date of service of this order. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order by certified mail on the respondent and the United States Attorney. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/4/12. (xc:Pro se party, Respondent and U.S. Attorney by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?