Matthews v. Civic Core et al
| Mack Matthews |
| Civic Core, Correction Corporation of America, (f/n/u) Lindamood, Rhonda Staggs and (f/n/u) Riley |
| 1:2016cv00108 |
| December 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Davidson |
| Barbara D. Holmes |
| William J. Haynes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER: (1) The Reports and Recommendations (Doc. Nos. 33 & 39 ) are ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Matthews' Motions for Transfer (Doc. Nos. 26 & 27 ) are DENIED; and (3) The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19 ) filed by Defendants Staggs, Ril ey and Lindamood is hereby GRANTED and the claims against those Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge Holmes for further pretrial case management in relation to Matthews' Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant CivicCore. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/26/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
|
Filing
39
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 19 ) filed by Defendants Rhonda Staggs, Rhonda Riley, and Cherry Lindamood be GRANTED and that these Defendants be DISMI SSED from the lawsuit. ANY OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of service of this Report and Recommendation and must state with particularity the specific portions of this Repo rt and Recommendation to which objection is made. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 5/8/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 15.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the reco rd. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/13/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail)(af) Modified on 3/13/2017 (af).
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 6) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/15/2017. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
