Adams v. Beane et al
Plaintiff: Brandon Adams
Defendant: Benjamin Beane, Kevin Genovese, Stacy Oakes, Daniel Epley, Bruce Coates, Rita Edwards, Melissa Brady and Mark Dressler
Case Number: 1:2017cv00055
Filed: June 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Columbia Office
County: Hickman
Presiding Judge: Waverly D. Crenshaw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 59 ), which was filed on September 10, 2019. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant Epley 's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 57 ) be granted and this action be dismissed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Epley's M otion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 57 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. All claims having been dismissed, this Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/25/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
October 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Oakes' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 40) is GRANTED. The case is returned to the Magistrate Judge f or further proceedings as to Defendant Daniel Epley. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/27/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
April 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 26 ) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED IN PART as it concerns Defendant Oakes and the Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 20 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation concerning Defendant Epley. (Doc. Nos. 28, 29.) On March 22, 2018, after reviewing those Objections, the Magistrate Judge, with knowledge of the Court, vacated the part of the Report and Recommendation concerning Defendant Epley and issued orders to facilit ate service of process. Accordingly, this vacated part of the Report and Recommendation need not be addressed. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/2/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Beane et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin Beane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Genovese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacy Oakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Epley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bruce Coates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rita Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Brady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Dressler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?