Douglas v. Hininger et al
| Gregory D. Douglas |
| Damon Hininger, Brandon E. Bowers and Joshep J. Froio |
| 1:2018cv00015 |
| February 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Columbia Office |
| Hickman |
| Waverly D. Crenshaw |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER: Having fully considered Defendants' objections, the Court concludes they are without merit, and that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment 51 is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims against Core Civic and his claims against the individual defendants in their official capacity are dismissed. In all other respects, the Motion is denied. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/5/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER: The Defendants' Petition for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses (Docket No. 54 ) is GRANTED. Defendants are awarded a total of $729.45 in reasonable expenses and fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 4/16/2020. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
