Brashear v. CCG Systems, Inc.
| Danny Brashear |
| CCG Systems, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00073 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| William L Campbell |
| Barbara D Holmes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by CCG Systems, Inc.. (Park, John) |
| Filing 18 Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to re #15 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Danny Brashear.(Preston, G.) Modified Text on 11/4/2019 (am). |
Filing 17
ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.01(h)(2), the District Judge is provided notice that on October 18, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss with supporting memorandum (Docket Nos. 15, 16). Any response by Plaintiff shall be filed pursuant to Rule 12, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Local Rule 7.01(a)(3). An optional reply may be filed within seven (7) days of the filing of the response, and shall not exceed five (5) pages. The Clerk is directed to forward the motion to the Honorable William L. Campbell, Jr., District Judge for his consideration of Defendant's motion to dismiss. The initial case management conference remains scheduled for 11:30 a.m., November 19, 2019, whether or not a ruling has entered on this pending motion, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/24/2019. (am)
|
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support of #15 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by CCG Systems, Inc. . (Park, John) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by CCG Systems, Inc.. (Park, John) |
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against CCG Systems, Inc., filed by Danny Brashear.(am) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to amend (Docket No. 11), which, the Court notes, is unnecessary as Plaintiff is permitted to amend his complaint as matter of course under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), but is nevertheless GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to separately file the First Amended Complaint (found at Docket No. 11-1). Once filed, the First Amended Complaint is the legally operative complaint, Drake v. City of Detroit, 266 F.App'x 444, 448 (6th Cir. 2008), thus rendering moot Defendant's pending motion to dismiss (Docket No. 6). The Clerk is therefore directed to terminate that motion. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 (a)(3). Also pending is Defendant's motion to consolidate cases (Docket No. 9). Although no timely response to the motion to consolidate was filed (see Local Rule 7.01(a)(3)), which indicates the motion is unopposed (id.), the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the following reasons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/10/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Danny Brashear. (Preston, G.) |
| Filing 11 First MOTION to Amend/Correct by Danny Brashear. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed First Amended Complaint)(Preston, G.) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.01(h)(2), the District Judge is provided notice that on September 17, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss with supporting memorandum (Docket Nos. 6, 7). Any response by Plaintiff shall be filed pursuant to Rule 12, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Local Rule 7.01(a)(3). An optional reply may be filed within seven (7) days of the filing of the response, and shall not exceed five (5) pages. The Clerk is directed to forward the motion to the Honorable William L. Campbell, Jr., District Judge for his consideration of Defendant's motion to dismiss. The initial case management conference remains scheduled for 11:30 a.m., November 19, 2019, whether or not a ruling has entered on this pending motion, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 9/30/2019. (am)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Opposed Motion to Consolidate with Case No. 1:18-cv-59 by CCG Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First Amended Complaint)(Park, John) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Lead counsel for the parties shall attend the initial case management conference. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/19/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by CCG Systems, Inc. . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint)(Park, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by CCG Systems, Inc.. (Park, John) |
| TN State Bar status verified as active for G. Kline Preston, IV, John J. Park, Taylor J. Askew. (am) |
| Filing 5 BUSINESS ENTITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CCG Systems, Inc.. (Park, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/19/2019 at 11:30 AM in Columbia before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (am) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Business Entity Disclosure Statement filing requirement. (am) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (am) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CCG Systems, Inc. from Marshall County Chancery Court, case number 18850. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0650-2989704) (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Original Complaint)(am) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brashear v. CCG Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CCG Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John J. Park |
| Represented By: | Taylor J. Askew |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Danny Brashear | |
| Represented By: | G. Kline Preston, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
