Glennwood Systems, LLC v. Tabor
||Glennwood Systems, LLC and Glenwood Systems, Inc.
||David C. Tabor
||June 30, 2010
||US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
||William J. Haynes
|Nature of Suit:
||Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 18, 2011
ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Defendant Glenwood Systems, LLCs motion for confirmation of arbitration award (Docket Entry No. 76) is GRANTED; Defendant Glenwood Systems, LLCs motion to strike (Docket Entry No. 89) is DE NIED as moot; Defendant Glenwood Systems, LLCs motion for attorney fees (Docket Entry No. 90) is GRANTED; and Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in Case No. 2:10-00061 (Docket Entry No. 8 ) is GRANTED. This is the Final Order in this action. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 01/18/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Text Searchable Order)(ab)
|January 11, 2011
ORDER: Upon review of the files, these actions involve a common nucleus of facts and related parties. Thus, the Court concludes that it is appropriate to consolidate these actions to promote judicial economy and avoid unnecessary costs to the parties and witnesses in discovery and jurors at trial. Accordingly, these actions (2:04-cv-0091 & 2:10-cv-0061) are consolidated for all purposes. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 1/11/11. (***ALL FUTURE FILINGS SHALL BE MADE IN THE LEAD CASE 2:04-cv-0091***) (af)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?