Arnold v. Federal-Mogul Products, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rosie Arnold
Defendant: Federal-Mogul Products, Inc. and Debbie Hitchcock
Case Number: 2:2011cv00126
Filed: December 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Cookeville Office
County: DeKalb
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER: Jury Trial set for 12/9/2014 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Pretrial Conference set for 12/1/2007 at 1:30 PM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Exhibit List due and Witness List due by 11/26/2014. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 11/26/2014. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/24/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: The Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 15 is hereby DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/21/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal of Defendant Debbie Hitchcock 23 filed by the Plaintiff, Defendant Debbie Hitchcock is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Debbie Hitchcock terminated. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/17/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Motion to Amend Pleadings due by 10/16/2012. Discovery due by 12/31/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 2/28/2013. Telephone Conference set for 10/30/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Joe Brown.To participate in th e conference call, parties will call 615-695-2851 at the scheduled time. After consulting with Judge Sharp's courtroom deputy, this matter is set for trial on 8/21/2013 at 9:00 AM in Cookeville before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Pretrial Con ference is set for 8/6/2013 at 1:30 PM in Cookeville before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Judge Sharp will issue a separate order covering his requirements for the final pretrial conference and the trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/30/12. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnold v. Federal-Mogul Products, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosie Arnold
Represented By: William Bush
Represented By: Marla K. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal-Mogul Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Debbie Hitchcock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?