Findler v. County of Cumberland, Tennessee et al
| Joseph Findler, IV |
| Jessica Burgess, Larry Warner, County of Cumberland, Tennessee, James Hargis, Bryant Dunaway, Jake Bramer, Doe 6-16 and Doe 1-5 |
| 2:2019cv00075 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Waverly D Crenshaw |
| Alistair Newbern |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Joseph Findler, IV. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Envelope)(dt) |
Filing 2
ORDER: This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to oversee service of process on the Defendants, enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/9/19. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
| Notice mailed to pro se party regarding filing of new case (docket sheet and blank, pro se forms included). (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jake Bramer, Jessica Burgess, County of Cumberland, Tennessee, Doe 1-5, Doe 6-16, Bryant Dunaway, James Hargis, Larry Warner (Filing fee $400, Receipt number 34675056444), filed by Joseph Findler, IV. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Receipt, #3 Attachment Summons)(hb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
