Houston v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Thomas D. Houston
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA-Email Notification
Case Number: 2:2021cv00010
Filed: March 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Waverly D Crenshaw
Referring Judge: Alistair Newbern
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas D. Houston. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security served on 3/26/2021. (Osterhout, Karl)
April 19, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Attorney General on 3/29/2021 by Thomas D. Houston. (Osterhout, Karl)
April 19, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney on 3/30/2021 by Thomas D. Houston. (Osterhout, Karl)
April 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 : Having satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 83.01(b), the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Karl E. Osterhout is granted. Signed by Vicki Kinkade, Chief Deputy Clerk, on 4/18/21. (vk)
April 2, 2021 TN State Bar status verified as active for Robert Scott Wilson admitted to this court. (kc)
April 1, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Scott Wilson on behalf of Thomas D. Houston (Wilson, Robert)
March 31, 2021 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Karl E. Osterhout: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall associate local counsel qualified to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Local counsel shall electronically file a Notice of Appearance (LR 83.01(d)). The Motion for Pro Hac Vice filed on 3/15/2021 will not be ruled on until local counsel is secured. Appearance by local counsel due by 4/21/2021. (kc)
March 17, 2021 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Service packet returned to counsel by regular mail.) (kc)
March 15, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Karl E. Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice (paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number 0650-3331913) by Thomas D. Houston. (Attachments: #1 Attachment CGS -PA Supreme Court, #2 Attachment CGS - WD PA, #3 Attachment Proposed Order)(Osterhout, Karl)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is GRANTED. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and the Local Rules of Court. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/12/2021. (kc)
March 5, 2021 Filing 5 (DISREGARD: ENTER IN CLERICAL ERROR)NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference is set for 5/10/2021 at 9:30 AM in Cookeville before Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern. (kc) Modified on 3/5/2021 (bs).
March 5, 2021 Filing 4 (DISREGARD: ENTER IN CLERICAL ERROR) - NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference is set for 5/3/2021 at 3:30 PM in Courtroom 764 before Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes. (kc) Modified on 3/5/2021 (bs).
March 5, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE/INFORMATION regarding Consent of the Parties to the Magistrate Judge. (kc)
March 5, 2021 PA State Bar status verified as active for Karl E. Osterhoust not admitted to this court - Local counsel required. (kc)
March 5, 2021 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Karl E. Osterhoust: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall associate local counsel qualified to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Local counsel shall electronically file a Notice of Appearance (LR 83.01(d)). Appearance by local counsel due by 3/26/2021. (kc)
March 5, 2021 NOTICE TO COUNSEL Karl E. Osterhoust: WITHIN 21 DAYS, counsel shall file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, a Certificate of Good Standing signed by the Clerk of a United States District Court or a U. S. appellate court where admitted, and pay a fee of $150.00 (LR 83.01(b)). PHV due by 3/26/2021. (kc)
March 3, 2021 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Thomas D. Houston. (kc)
March 3, 2021 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $0, Receipt number 0), filed by Thomas D. Houston. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Civil Cover Sheet)(kc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Houston v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas D. Houston
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Represented By: Robert Scott Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA-Email Notification
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?