Restaurant Supply v. Leischow, et al
Plaintiff: Restaurant Supply Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Dean Leischow and LGI Energy Solutions, Inc.
Counter_plaintiff: LGI Energy Solutions, Inc.
Counter_defendant: Restaurant Supply Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2004cv00786
Filed: September 16, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
Presiding Judge: Robert Echols
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 254 ORDER: After careful review, RSSI's MOTION to Enter Final Judgment Or, In the Alternative, To Show Cause (Docket Entry No. 252 ) is granted in part and denied in part as moot. The Motion is granted in that the Court will enter a final modified judgment against Dean Leischow individually and thus, RSSI's alternative request for a show cause order is moot. Accordingly, in accordance with the decision of the Sixth Circuit, the Court finds that RSSI is entitled to damages against Deft Dea n Leischow, individually, in the amount of $747,414.36 which includes pre-judgment interest. Further post-judgment interest on the Court's pre-appellate damages award of $492,082.36 shall run from 1/15/08 to the date of entry of this f inal amended judgment at the rate of interest that was effective on 1/15/08. Further, post-judgment interest on the modified damages award of $747,414.36 shall run from the date of entry of this final amended judgment at the rate of interest effective on 1/15/08. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final amended judgment against Defendant Dean Leischow in accordance with FRCP 58 and 79(a). Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 9/16/09. (km)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Restaurant Supply v. Leischow, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Restaurant Supply Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Katherine Anne Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean Leischow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LGI Energy Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_plaintiff: LGI Energy Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Restaurant Supply Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Katherine Anne Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?