
Plaintiff, a music publishing company, alleges that Defendants infringed its copyrights by allowing users to upload videos containing plaintiff's copyrighted works and providing access to certain content filtering technologies only to existing business partners.
Cal IV Entertainment, LLC |
Youtube, Inc., Youtube, LLC and Google, Inc. |
3:2007cv00617 |
June 7, 2007 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
John S. Bryant |
Robert Echols |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() ORDER: Pltf has submitted a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert Echols on 7/10/07. (jb)
|
![]() |
Filing
18
NOTICE of Appearance by Laurel Alyson Johnston on behalf of Cal IV Entertainment, LLC (Johnston, Laurel)
|
Filing
9
SUMMONS returned executed by Cal IV Entertainment, LLC. Google, Inc. served on 6/13/2007. (Martin, Gerald)
|
Filing
7
SUMMONS returned executed by Cal IV Entertainment, LLC. Youtube, LLC served on 6/12/2007. (Martin, Gerald)
|
Filing
6
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Cal IV Entertainment, LLC. (Martin, Gerald)
|
Filing
3
NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for Monday, 7/30/2007 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 776 before Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant. (rm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.