Allen v. Davidson Transit Organization et al
Plaintiff: Sheryl Allen
Defendant: Davidson Transit Organization, Metropolitan Transit Authority, Amalgamated Transit Union and ATU Local 1235
Case Number: 3:2008cv00273
Filed: March 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MEMORANDUM and ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the pltf's Motion For Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice 80 is GRANTED, conditioned upon the following: 1. All discovery and other relevant information pertaining to this case may be used in any subsequent filing by this plaintiff against defendant DTO for claims similar to those raised in this case; and 2. Should this plaintiff file another action based, in whole or in part, on the claims raised in this lawsuit against defendant DTO, de fendant DTO may bring that to the attention of this court, which will consider ordering the plaintiff to pay all or part of the costs of this action and may stay the new case until the plaintiff has so complied, all pursuant to Rule 41(d), FED. R. CIV. P. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 12/15/09. (tmw)
October 23, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, Metropolitan Transit Authority's Motion to Dismiss 31 , Amalgamated Transit Union's Motion to Dismiss 40 , and Local Union 1235's Motion to Dismiss 42 are GRANTED. Davidson Transit Organization's Motion to Dismiss Counts 1, 3, and 5 28 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is so ordered. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/23/08. (tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Davidson Transit Organization et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheryl Allen
Represented By: Fikisha Liki Swader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davidson Transit Organization
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Transit Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amalgamated Transit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ATU Local 1235
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?