Purdue v. Apple Inc. et al
David C. Purdue |
Apple Inc. and AT&T Corp. |
3:2010cv00687 |
July 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Williamson |
E. Clifton Knowles |
Aleta A. Trauger |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Aleta A. Trauger for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 7/19/10. (rd) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Initial Case Management Conference set for Monday 9/13/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 661 before Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles. (eh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC Clerk regarding Corporate Disclosure Statement requirement (eh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Corp., Apple Inc., filed by David C. Purdue.Filing fee paid $350. Summons issued. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Attachment summons)(eh) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL R. Brent Irby : WITHIN 10 DAYS (on or before 7/30/2010), counsel shall associate local counsel qualified to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Local counsel shall electronically file a Notice of Appearance (LR 83.01(h). (eh) |
Bar status for attorney Robert Brent Irby of AL verified as active on this date. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.