Homler v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff: Shirley Homler
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Case Number: 3:2010cv01154
Filed: December 9, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Williamson
Presiding Judge: Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: On 5/23/2011, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation entered a Transfer Order transferring this case to the District of New Jersey, and on 5/24/2011, the Clerk of this Court received a copy of the Transfer Order 15 . For the reasons s tated in the Transfer Order, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, I hereby TRANSFER this case to the District of New Jersey, and it is, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 5/31/11. (dt)
May 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: By order entered 5/23/2011, and docketed in this Court on 5/24/2011 15 , the Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation ordered that this case be transferred to the District of New Jersey. As a result, the case management conference, schedule d by order entered 1/19/2011 10 , on 6/10/2011, is CANCELLED. The Clerk is directed to forward the file in this case to the Honorable John T. Nixon for entry of an order transferring this case to the District of New Jersey. Unless otherwise directed by the Court or upon motion of the parties, there will be no further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge in this case. Judge Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/24/11. (dt)
April 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: MOTION to Stay 11 is Granted, and all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending the ruling by the Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation, except that counsel for the parties shall convene a telephone conference call with the Court on Friday, 4/ 22/2011, at 2:00 p.m., to be initiated by defendant's counsel, to address whether any objections have been filed with the MDL to the defendant's motion to establish an MDL proceeding, and the expected time frame within which the MDL is expected to rule on the defendants motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/18/11. (dt)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 10/31/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 5/30/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/19/11. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Homler v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shirley Homler
Represented By: Brian D. Cummings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?