HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc. v. Informatica Corporation
Plaintiff: HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc.
Defendant: Informatica Corporation
Case Number: 3:2010cv01155
Filed: December 9, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: E. Clifton Knowles
Presiding Judge: John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER: Pending before the Court are Defendants Motion for Relief from the Initial Case Management Order and Defendants Motion for Expedited Consideration of that same Motion. Docket Entry Nos. 109 and 111 . These Motions are granted, and with perm ission of Judge Nixon, the trial date is continued. The following deadlines are extended as follows: Discovery due by 5/23/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 6/23/2012. Jury Trial reset for 11/6/2012 at 9:00 AM before Senior Judge John T. Nixon. Pretrial Conference reset for 10/26/2012 at 10:00 AM before Senior Judge John T. Nixon. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 1/26/12. (dt)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER granting 106 Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 1/18/12. (dt)
January 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER granting 92 Motion for Oral Argument on 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court Schedules a hearing for 2/13/2012 at 10:00 a.m. Also, the Motion for Leave to File a Surreply 97 is Granted. Defendant may file a surreply brief no later than one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 1/4/12. (dt)
October 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER: Deft's 51 Motion to Deny or Continue Consideration of Pltf's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part to the extent that deft may conduct the specified depositions and other discovery that it reasonably believes will lead to information on the timing of pltfs initial use of multiple repositories. The Court finds that defts requested extension is likely to beunnecessarily long. Deft is granted 30 days from entry of this Order to respond to pltfs 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 10/25/11. (rd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc. v. Informatica Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Informatica Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc.
Represented By: Katharine R. Cloud
Represented By: John R. Jacobson
Represented By: Jason C. Kravitz
Represented By: Gregg A. Rubenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?