Anderson v. Commissioner Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
| Trevor Manny Anderson |
| Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Desirie Andrews, Innocentas Sator, Commissioner Tennessee Department of Corrections, Ricky Bell and Wanda Arnold |
| 3:2011cv00806 |
| August 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R 63 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) The Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Schofield 38 and Bell 49 are hereby GRANTED; (3) The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant s Andrews, Arnold, Correctional Medical Services, and Sator 43 is hereby GRANTED; and (4) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/31/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
63
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above, the undersigned RECOMMENDS Defendants Bell and Schofield's Motions be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED against them. Further, the Corizon Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment s hould be GRANTED. Because the Magistrate Judge believes these Motions should be granted, no Defendants would remain in the lawsuit, and this action should be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/13/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER: On November 30, 2011, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Docket No. 34), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 13) be denied because Plaintiff has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim that he has been deprived of adequate medical care, and has failed to show that the failure to issue an injunction will cause him irreparable harm. Despite being specifically advised in the R & R that any objections to the R & R were to be filed within fourteen days, Plaintiff has filed no objections. Having reviewed the matter in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accord ingly, (1) The R & R (Docket No. 34) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 13) is hereby DENIED; and (3) This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial case management. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/9/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(af)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: The Court has received a letter from the plaintiff dated 12/26/2011, Docket Entry No. 46 . This letter to the Court is neither signed nor is there a certificate of service. The Clerk is directed not to accept for filing any further documents from the plaintiff which do not contain a proper certificate of service. The Magistrate Judge will GRANT the plaintiff until 1/18/2012, to respond to these two motions 38 and 43 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 1/5/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends pltf's 13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/30/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
