Canfield v. Social Security Administration
||Harold Dean Canfield
||Social Security Administration
||January 9, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
||Juliet E. Griffin
||John T. Nixon
|Nature of Suit:
||Supplemental Security Income
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 21, 2017
ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 27), no which no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. Th e Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, and this action is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/21/2017. (jw)
|March 1, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record (DE 12) be GRANTED and the Commissioners decision be REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 3/1/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?