Freeman et al v. Troutt et al
| Jaworski McMurry, Timothy Parsons, Johnny Davis, Billy Dishman, LaBron Luke, Robert Freeman and Kenneth Blaylock |
| Sonya Troutt and Sonny Weatherford |
| 3:2012cv00266 |
| March 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Sumner |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Civil Rights |
| 42:1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 124) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants Trout and Weatherford's Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiffs Robert Freeman, Johnny Davi s and Billy Dishman's Failure to Serve Answers to Discovery (Docket Entry No. 112) is hereby GRANTED; and (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/15/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
124
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Knowles recommends that Defendants' Troutt and Weatherford's Motion to Dismiss 112 be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs Robert Freeman, Johnny Davis, and Billy Dishman be terminated as parties to this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 3/13/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
120
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned concludes that, viewing all the facts and inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and Defendant SHP is entitled to a judgmen t as a matter of law. The undersigned therefore recommends that the instant Motion for Summary Judgment 103 be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/26/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER: Jury Trial set for 5/20/2014 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. Pretrial Conference set for 5/14/2014 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 661 before Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 5/5/2014. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/5/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 8/7/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER: Jury Trial set for 5/20/2014 09:00 AM before District Judge Kevin H. Sharp. The Magistrate Judge shall conduct the pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. He shall assist the plaintiff with the preparation of subpoenas, discuss exhib its, instructions and all other matters necessary for having the case prepared to be tried on the date set. The Magistrate Judge has been managing this case. If he considers it appropriate to appoint counsel to represent the plaintiff at trial, he should do so. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/12/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION: An appropriate order will enter. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/20/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
