Cunningham v. Ocwen Financial et al
| Craig Cunningham |
| Ocwen Financial, Litton Loan Servicing, Equifax, Trans Union, Experian and John/Jane Doe 1-10 |
| 3:2012cv00440 |
| May 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Joe Brown |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
166
ORDER: This suit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety. It is further ORDERED that each party shall bear its own costs and fees. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/3/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The defendants' Objections are not persuasive and they are, therefore, OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 142 ) is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of t his court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal (Docket No. 131 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as detailed in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/19/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
142
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED in regard to Plaintiffs claims that Defendants': 1) reported on loans they did not own; 2) failed to report the results of their inve stigation to him; 3) initially reported inaccurate information to CRAs; and 4) failed to provide an adverse action notice; and that those claims be DISMISSED. The Magistrate Judge also recommends that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss be DENI ED in regard to Plaintiff's claims that Defendants failed to conduct reasonable investigations or that they failed to "modify, delete, or permanently block" inaccurate information subsequent to an investigation; and that those claims be allowed to PROCEED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 12/10/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
80
PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(Brown, Joe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
