Odom v. Chute et al
Plaintiff: Jereme Odom
Defendant: David Edward Chute and Kathleen Patricia Chute
Counter_plaintiff: Kathleen Patricia Chute and David Edward Chute
Counter_defendant: Jereme Odom
Case Number: 3:2012cv00586
Filed: June 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Accordingly, this case is hereby REMANDED to the General Sessions Court for Montgomery County Tennessee. The Chutes' Motion for Te mporary Restraining Order 3 , Motion to Dismiss Restraining Order 10 , Motion to Dismiss False Statements Made in Affidavit of Jereme Odom 11 , Motion to Give an Assertion of Status on the Requested Plea 13 , and Motion to Accept Exhibits/Evidence Manually 14 are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/11/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail; certified copy to General Sessions Court for Montgomery County)(tmw)
June 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: By 6/15/2012, the Chutes shall either file a Complaint in this action or file a notice stating that they wish to remove the General Sessions case to this court. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/7/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Odom v. Chute et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jereme Odom
Represented By: Mark Robert Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Edward Chute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Patricia Chute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_plaintiff: Kathleen Patricia Chute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_plaintiff: David Edward Chute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Jereme Odom
Represented By: Mark Robert Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?