Strange v. Social Security Administration
||Calvin D. Strange, Jr.
||Social Security Administration
||December 4, 2012
||Tennessee Middle District Court
||E. Clifton Knowles
||John T. Nixon
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
|Cause of Action:
||42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 22, 2013
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 26 MOTION for Judgment on the Record. For the reasons discussed, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record be DENIED, and that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 7/22/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|August 11, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court finds substantial evidence in the record supported ALJ Shaughnessy's decision and therefore ADOPTS the Report (Doc. No. 40 ) in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. No. 26 ) is DENIE D and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The case is hereby DISMISSED. By this Order, the Commissioner's pending Motion for a Stay Because of Lapse of Appropriations (Doc. No. 48 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Abeyance (Doc. N o. 49 ) are TERMINATED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 8/8/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.