Hamby v. Gentry et al
Plaintiff: William Davidson Hamby, Jr.
Defendant: Beth Gentry and Daron Hall
Case Number: 3:2012cv01296
Filed: December 13, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Davidson
Presiding Judge: John S. Bryant
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER: The Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R Docket No. 106 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Docket No. 98 is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/25/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 1/13/2015. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 78) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. The (Dual) Motion for Summary Judgement [sic] in Favor of Plaintiff (Docket Entry No. 49) shall be DENIED. All pending motions (Docket Entry Nos. 31, 46, 57 and 68) are hereby DENIED as moot. This action is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial management. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/17/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
September 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 18) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Plaintiff's Motion to File Tort against Defendants (Docket Entry No. 16) is hereby DENIED. This action is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial management. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/14/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
August 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER denying 50 Motion for Oral Deposition. Plaintiff may conduct depositions by written questions pursuant to Rule 31, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/29/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/26/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER denying 44 Motion to Amend Suit, 47 Motion to Amend Suit and for Emergency TRO, and 51 Motion to Amend Suit. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/22/2014. (xc: Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated below, the undersigned Magistrate Judge recommends that defendants' motion to dismiss 13 be granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/1/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Therefore, the motion for a preliminary injunction should be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 6/27/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamby v. Gentry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Davidson Hamby, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beth Gentry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daron Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?