Watkins v. CCA-Corporation of America, et al
| Larry Tyrone Watkins |
| Blair Leibach, V. Bermudez, (f/n/u) Cato, CCA-Corporation of America, J. Sausedo, (f/n/u) Pittman, (f/n/u) Perry and (f/n/u) Davis |
| 3:2013cv00179 |
| March 1, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Cannon |
| Joe Brown |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER: Because it appears from his submission that the plaintiff lacks sufficient financial resources from which to pay the full filing fee in advance, the application 6 is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint in forma pauperis and to assign a civil action number to this file. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b),the plaintiff is nonetheless assessed the $350.00 civil filing fee. As explained in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the court finds that the complaint fail s to state a colorable claim under § 1983 against any of the defendants named in the complaint. The complaint is therefore DISMISSED in its entirety for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/1/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail; Administrator of the Metro-Davidson County Detention Facility via reg mail)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
