Grooms v. Fouson et al
||Lenzo Grooms, Jr.
||March 20, 2013
||Tennessee Middle District Court
||Todd J. Campbell
||E. Clifton Knowles
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 13, 2013
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 17 is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Slaven's Motion to Dismiss 15 is DENIED. Also pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Stay 21 . Plaintiff shall file any Response to that Motion by 8/23/2013. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/13/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|April 20, 2015
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 43 ), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Slaven's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 35 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Slaven are DISMISSED. All claims and all Defendants having been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to close this file. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/20/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.