Proctor v. Bledsoe et al
Plaintiff: Gregg Proctor
Defendant: Jeff Bledsoe, Dickson County Jail and Southern Health Partners
Case Number: 3:2013cv00309
Filed: April 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Nashville Office
County: Dickson
Presiding Judge: Joe Brown
Presiding Judge: Kevin H. Sharp
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation 68 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) The Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Southern Health Partners, Inc. 61 is hereby GRANTED; (3) Defendant Sheri ff Jeff Bledsoe's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 63 is hereby GRANTED; (4) All other pending motions are hereby TERMINATED as moot; (5) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (6) The Court hereby certifies that any appeal wo uld not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/29/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Brown recommends that: 1) defendant Southern Health Partner's (SHP) motion for summary judgment 61 be GRANTED; 2) Sheriff Bledsoe's motion for judgment on the pleadings 63 be GRANTED; 3) this case be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; 4) dismissal of this action count as a "STRIKE" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 5) the order accepting and adopting this R&R constitute the FINAL J UDGMENT in this action; 6) any appeal NOT be certified as taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); 7) any pending motions be TERMINATED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/3/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Proctor v. Bledsoe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Bledsoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dickson County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Health Partners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregg Proctor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?