Riddle v. Riddle
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 6, 2013
ORDER: Because the plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's order and failed to take the necessary steps to prosecute this action, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED. Further, the Clerk is DIRECTED to unseal the document filed at docket entry no. 10. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 6/6/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
|April 30, 2013
ORDER: Accordingly, Riddle has not provided a legitimate basis for reconsideration of the order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion to reconsider is therefore DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/30/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?