Lang v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Middle District Lang v. Social Security Administration

Lang v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Ricardo Jermaine Lang
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2013cv00368
Filed:	April 19, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge:	John T. Nixon
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 21, 2014	Filing 23 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/21/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified on 1/22/2014 (dt).
July 24, 2013	Filing 11 ORDER: This action was filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Commissioner has responded by filing an answer (Docket Entry No. 9 ) on June 25, 2013. The plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from entry of this order to file a motion for j udgment on the record and accompanying memorandum. The defendant shall, within thirty (30) days of the filing of the plaintiff's motion, file a response. The defendant shall respond SPECIFICALLY to each issue raised by the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have 14 days from the filing of the response to file a reply if necessary. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 7/24/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 21, 2014

Filing 23 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/21/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) Modified on 1/22/2014 (dt).

July 24, 2013

Filing 11 ORDER: This action was filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Commissioner has responded by filing an answer (Docket Entry No. 9 ) on June 25, 2013. The plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from entry of this order to file a motion for j udgment on the record and accompanying memorandum. The defendant shall, within thirty (30) days of the filing of the plaintiff's motion, file a response. The defendant shall respond SPECIFICALLY to each issue raised by the plaintiff. The plaintiff shall have 14 days from the filing of the response to file a reply if necessary. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 7/24/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lang v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricardo Jermaine Lang
Represented By:	T. Blaine Dixon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?