Doolen v. Bledsoe et al
| Mark Doolen |
| David Darnell, Rondia Felts, Donnie Young, Jerone Holt, Jeff Bledsoe and C. Jones |
| 3:2013cv00905 |
| September 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Dickson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER: The plaintiff is advised that process cannot be resent to the defendant unless the plaintiff provides a different address for service of process. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the defendant be served within 12 0 days of the October 11, 2013, Order, or the action may be subject to dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 11/4/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail only.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to return the plaintiff's unsigned application to him. The plaintiff is granted 14 days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to sign the application and resubmit it to the Clerk's Office. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/23/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular w/ original application and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
