Morton v. Vanderbilt
Tracy Morton |
Vanderbilt University |
3:2013cv01012 |
September 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Todd J. Campbell |
Juliet E. Griffin |
Other Labor Litigation |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 4/17/15. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) |
Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 49 ) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED. (2) Defendant's Motion to Dis miss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 17 ) is DENIED. (3) Plaintiff's Motion For Class Certification (Docket No. 21 ) is GRANTED. (4) The Court DESIGNATES Tracy Morton as Class Representative, APPOINTS Barrett Johnston, LLC as Class Counsel, and CERTIFIES the following class: Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/17/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) |
Filing 43 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Todd J. Campbell recused. Case reassigned to Senior Judge John T. Nixon for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/20/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.