Watson v. Cartee et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 17, 2017
ORDER: The Court rules as follows: (1) The R&R (Docket No 125 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) The Second Motion for Order of Sale (Docket No. 105 ) is GRANTED; (3) The Motion to Withdraw (Docket No. 128 ) is GRANTED; (4) The Motion for Disb ursement of Sale Proceeds (Docket No. 130 ) is GRANTED; (5) The Motion for Oral Arguments (Docket No. 132 ) is DENIED; and (6) With these rulings, the Motions to Ascertain Status (Docket Nos. 137 & 139 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. It is FURTHER ORDERE D that Mr. Ingram is hereby authorized to sell the real property located at 514 Park Center Drive, Nashville, Tennessee 37205, with any minimum sale price being $2,500,000.00, and that, after payment of the costs and expenses of the sale, the proceeds from this sale shall be paid to Mr. Ingram. The Clerk of the Court shall enter final judgment in this matter in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/17/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|November 30, 2016
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the second motion for an order of sale of the property by Mr. Ingram (Docket Entry 105) be granted. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court enter an order authorizing the sale of the property identical to the order previously entered by the undersigned at Docket Entry 114. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/30/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|April 22, 2015
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Upon careful review, the court can also identify no manifest injustice in the February 19 summary judgment decision. To the contrary, the court concludes that its decision was fair and correct. Several months have passed since that ruling. Overall, this straightforward mortgage matter has lingered for over a year. There is, still, a need for finality for the parties. The "Motion to Amend" (Docket No. 86 ) is DENIED.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/22/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|February 19, 2015
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the court's concurrently-filed Memorandum, Defendant Regions Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Complaint 35 is GRANTED. Regions Bank shall be paid the sum of $281,632.74, which represents t he entire balance currently being held in the registry of the court in this matter. Regions Bank shall request disbursement of these funds by the Clerk of Court within ten days, and the funds shall be paid to counsel for Regions Bank. Third Party D efendant Henry Preston Ingrams Motion for Summary Judgment 59 on the Third Party Complaint is GRANTED. Third Party Plaintiffs Diana L. Day Cartee and Alan Cartee's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Third Party Complaint is DENIED. The Cl erk of Court shall (1) enter judgment in favor of (a) Regions Bank on the Complaint and (b) Henry Preston Ingram on the Third Party Complaint, and (2) close the case for all purposes. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/19/15. (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?