Adams v. Yates Services Nissan

Adams v. Yates Services Nissan

Plaintiff:	Tonia Y. Adams
Defendant:	Yates Services Nissan
Case Number:	3:2015cv00490
Filed:	April 27, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Rutherford
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 6, 2016	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The magistrate judge's recommendation, though appearing to be harsh, is well grounded in the factual history of this case, and dismissal with prejudice is fully warranted. For these reasons, the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/5/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) Modified on 5/6/2016 (eh).
March 28, 2016	Filing 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Defendant's motion (Docket Entry No. 19) to dismiss be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 3/28/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) Modified on 3/29/2016 (eh).

Date Filed

Document Text

May 6, 2016

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The magistrate judge's recommendation, though appearing to be harsh, is well grounded in the factual history of this case, and dismissal with prejudice is fully warranted. For these reasons, the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/5/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) Modified on 5/6/2016 (eh).

March 28, 2016

Filing 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Defendant's motion (Docket Entry No. 19) to dismiss be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 3/28/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh) Modified on 3/29/2016 (eh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Yates Services Nissan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tonia Y. Adams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Yates Services Nissan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?