Emrit v. VEVO, LLC et al
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| VEVO, LLC, Sony BMG, Inc., Warner Music Group, Inc. (WMG) and Blue2Digital, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv00970 |
| September 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Aleta A. Trauger |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On October 17, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 64), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made th e findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rules 4(m) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/10/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
64
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with Rules 4(m) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/17/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On March 28, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 49), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the f indings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Sony Music Entertainment (Docket No. 25 ) is GRANTED, and all claims against this defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/31/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
49
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 25) filed by Defendant Sony Music Entertainment be GRANTED and that this defendant be DISMISSED from the action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 3/28/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On December 28, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 37), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 28 ) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 35 ) are DENIED. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/9/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 28) and motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 35) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 12/28/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
