Meadow et al v. NIBCO, Inc.
| Chad Meadow, John Plisko, Susan Plisko and Kenneth McLaughlin |
| NIBCO, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv01124 |
| October 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Rutherford |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Barbara D. Holmes |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER: Pending before the Court is Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss the Class Action Complaint (Docket No. 31 ). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Plaintiffs shall file an Amended Complaint by June 15, 2016, alleging only those claims which remain in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/24/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.01(e) (1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), discovery is not stayed absent order of the District Judge. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Judge in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(d)(5). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 10/27/2015. (hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
