Nagarajan v. Hargrove et al
| Govindaswamy Nagarajan |
| Samuel Hargrove, Jeanetta Jackson, Linda Woodruff, Mark Hardy, Glenda Glover, Lonnie Sharpe, Sandra Scheick and Tennessee State University |
| 3:2016cv00495 |
| March 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Todd J. Campbell |
| Barbara D. Holmes |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 81 , filed March 4, 2020] is ADOPTED as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law for all purposes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection [ECF No. 82 , filed March 16, 2020] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 69 , filed May 10, 2019] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintif f's Title VII national origin discrimination claim and DENIED as to Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim. Signed by Visiting Chief Judge Denise Page Hood on 5/18/2020. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 42 , filed March 29, 2018] is ADOPTED as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant T ennessee State University's Motion for Partial Dismissal [Docket No. 36 , filed February 13, 2018] is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED. Signed by Visiting Chief Judge Denise Page Hood on 5/1/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: That Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes' Report and Recommendation [Dkt. No. 22, filed January 30, 2017] is ADOPTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 15, filed March 17, 2017] is GRANTED IN P ART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff claims for Title VII punitive damages are BARRED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Samuel Hargrove, Jeanetta Jackson, Linda Woodruff, Mark Hardy, Glenda Glover, Lonnie Sharpe, and Sand ra Scheick are DISMISSED from this cause of action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 26] against TSU is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before February 12, 2018, Plaintiff sha ll file with the Court an Amended Complaint consistent with the representations made in his Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, specifically those at page 9 (see Dkt. No. 26, PgID 412) and in his objections to the Report and Recommendation (see Dkt. No. 29, PgID 427 at n.1). Signed by Visiting Chief Judge Denise Page Hood on 1/16/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Presently pending is Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 15 ), to which Plaintiff has responded in opposition. See Docket Entry Nos. 15 and 21. For the reasons set out below, the undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that Defendants' motion be GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/30/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
