Holt v. Social Security Administration et al
||Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
||May 13, 2016
||US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
||E. Clifton Knowles
||John T. Nixon
|Nature of Suit:
||Supplemental Security Income
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 13, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 19 .) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and co nducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) (2006). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/12/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
|November 1, 2016
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, it is respectfully recommended that this action be DISMISSED for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute this case, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 11/1/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?