Crockett v. Hawkins et al
| Corey Crockett |
| Kizzy Hawkins, f/n/u Thomas, f/n/u Rycher, f/n/u Corlew, f/n/u Cato, f/n/u Jenkins, Wendy Ashe and f/n/u Burrells |
| 3:2016cv02059 |
| August 1, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Nashville Office |
| Davidson |
| Kevin H. Sharp |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER: Accordingly, for the reasons articulated above, Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes' Report and Recommendation [#42], dated July 6, 2017, is ACCEPTED IN PART. Plaintiff's objections [#43] are OVERRULED. Defendants' Motion for S ummary Judgment [#28] is GRANTED. This cause of action is dismissed. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Gershwin A. Drain on 8/7/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)
|
|
Filing
42
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set out above, the undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that the motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 28 ) of Defendants Wendy Ashe, Kizzy Hawkins, and Anita Jenkins be GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims and Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 7/6/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
