Hodge v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
Plaintiff: |
Maxwell M. Hodge, III |
Defendant: |
Corrections Corporation of America, (f/n/u) Liebach, Jerry Wardlow, Yolanda Pittman and (f/n/u) Payne |
Case Number: |
3:2016cv02470 |
Filed: |
September 9, 2016 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Office: |
Nashville Office |
County: |
Trousdale |
Presiding Judge: |
Barbara D. Holmes |
Presiding Judge: |
Aleta A. Trauger |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 10, 2017 |
Filing
99
ORDER: The plaintiff's "Respon[se] to Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes Recommendation" 94 (construed as objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation 92 ) is OVERRULED, and the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 68 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 93 and Motion for Court Order 97 , are DENIED AS MOOT and without prejudice to the plaintiff's ability to assert the unrelated new claims in an entirely new action. This is the final Order in this action, for purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/10/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
|
July 21, 2017 |
Filing
90
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The court OVERRULES the Objections (Doc. No. 67) and DENIES the motions for injunctive relief (Doc. Nos. 46 , 47 ). The matter remains referred to the magistrate judge. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/21/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
April 19, 2017 |
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Having conducted a de novo review of the plaintiff's Motion, and in the absence of any objection from the plaintiff, the Court finds that the plaintiff has shown no compelling reason for this relief. The Report and Recomm endation is ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. For the reasons expressed therein, the plaintiff's Motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Docket Entry No. 56 ) is hereby DENIED. This case is returne d to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/19/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
February 6, 2017 |
Filing
64
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 56) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 2/6/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
January 25, 2017 |
Filing
59
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction (Docket Entry Nos. 46 and 47) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 1/25/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
November 22, 2016 |
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On October 31, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 30), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motions for a Preliminary Injunction (Docket Nos. 9 , 13 , 15 ) are DENIED. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 11/22/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh) Modified on 11/23/2016 (eh).
|
October 31, 2016 |
Filing
30
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction (Docket Entry Nos. 9, 13, and 15) be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara D. Holmes on 10/31/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?