Lillard v. Sweeney

Lillard v. Sweeney

Plaintiff:	Kevin Lillard
Defendant:	Jason Sweeney
Case Number:	3:2017cv01101
Filed:	July 31, 2017
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Aleta A. Trauger
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 18, 2018	Filing 24 ORDER: On May 29, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #20), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of thi s court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/18/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)
September 5, 2017	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT & ORDER Assessing Filing Fee for Kevin Lillard $350, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. Accordingly, the plaintiff's application is GRANTED. The Clerk will file the complaint in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The plaintiff is herewith ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. The Clerk is instructed to send the plaintiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Officer Sweeney. The plaintif f will complete the service packet and return it to the Clerk's Office within twenty one (21) days of the date of receipt of this order. Upon return of the service packet, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE to the defendant. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and the Local Rules of Court. The Clerk is further instructed to send a copy of this order to the Warden of the Metro Davidson County Detention Facility to ensure that the custodian of the plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with that portion of the Prison Litigation Reform Act relating to the payment of the filing fee. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/5/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (Pro se party sent (1) service packet by regular mail.) (Warden of Davidson County Detention Facility sent copy of order by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 18, 2018

Filing 24 ORDER: On May 29, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #20), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of thi s court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/18/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)

September 5, 2017

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT & ORDER Assessing Filing Fee for Kevin Lillard $350, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley. Accordingly, the plaintiff's application is GRANTED. The Clerk will file the complaint in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The plaintiff is herewith ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. The Clerk is instructed to send the plaintiff a service packet (a blank summons and USM 285 form) for Officer Sweeney. The plaintif f will complete the service packet and return it to the Clerk's Office within twenty one (21) days of the date of receipt of this order. Upon return of the service packet, PROCESS SHALL ISSUE to the defendant. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to enter a scheduling order for the management of the case, to dispose or recommend disposition of any pretrial motions under 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and to conduct further proceedings, if necessary, under Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and the Local Rules of Court. The Clerk is further instructed to send a copy of this order to the Warden of the Metro Davidson County Detention Facility to ensure that the custodian of the plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with that portion of the Prison Litigation Reform Act relating to the payment of the filing fee. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/5/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (Pro se party sent (1) service packet by regular mail.) (Warden of Davidson County Detention Facility sent copy of order by regular mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lillard v. Sweeney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Lillard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Sweeney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?