Norris v. Core Civic Inc.

Norris v. Core Civic Inc.

Plaintiff:	Charles Norris
Defendant:	Core Civic Inc.
Case Number:	3:2017cv01150
Filed:	August 14, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Nashville Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	Alistair Newbern
Presiding Judge:	Waverly D. Crenshaw
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 8, 2018	Filing 28 ORDER: On April 17, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE # 27 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of la w of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 21 ) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust administra tive remedies. Any appeal from this dismissal will not be certified as taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/8/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
April 17, 2018	Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff's claims be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that any appeal from such a dismissal not be certified as taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/17/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 8, 2018

Filing 28 ORDER: On April 17, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE # 27 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of la w of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 21 ) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to exhaust administra tive remedies. Any appeal from this dismissal will not be certified as taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/8/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

April 17, 2018

Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff's claims be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that any appeal from such a dismissal not be certified as taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/17/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norris v. Core Civic Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Norris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Core Civic Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?